The line drawing shown above appears to be
a portrait of a man. The form of medium used is an ebony pencil on an 18x24
paper, creating clear, dark contour lines. The lines are mostly of a consistent
thickness, maintaining a solid tone all throughout. While most of the lines
contain smooth curves, the lower half of the portrait does have more jagged and
sharper lines. The composition itself is generally symmetrical, with the only
subject of the portrait being the figure. A thin, somewhat slanted border was
drawn as well.
The drawing itself was originally
done upside-down in order to train the artist’s skills in observation. While
not clearly visible, a grid was used to breakdown the subject into twelve
smaller subjects. By training the eye to observe the form instead of the
content itself, the end result came out more accurately than if done the
regular way. Not only did the grid make it easier to draw the image of Igor
Stravinsky, but it also aided with proportioning and scaling it to the original
model. The strict use of contour lines and lack of color make the portrait
appear very flat and two dimensional. It gives off a very simplistic and bare
tone, especially with its lack of any value change.
There isn’t really much to say about
the content of the drawing itself. The portrait, when turned upright, shows
twentieth century Russian composer Igor Stravinsky. I think that the real
message was more about how the drawing was done unconventionally, assuming that
Picasso did draw it upside down, than the actual subject of the drawing. For
me, the exercise was a lesson on observation and a study of how the human mind
works. The improved accuracy that can be achieved even for the least skilled of
artists when done upside down just goes to show how one’s preconceived ideas of
something can affect the drawing.
Overall, I think the portrait came
out very similar to the original drawing. When I was setting up the grid on the
original drawing, one specific detail that I had noticed was the inclusion of
borders, which were slanted and not perfectly perpendicular to each other. I
thought it was good detail to include in my drawing. There was also a slight
issue of the original drawing not being to scale with my paper, but after a bit
of tinkering with the sizes on a photo editor, it was quickly resolved. This
exercise was enjoyable and a good exercise for my observational skills that
have gone a bit rusty. It makes me wonder how exactly I would do if I had done
the drawing the conventional, upright way.
No comments:
Post a Comment